No a spy "base" vs nukes is not the same. The USSR used Cuba as a "listening" post for decades. I would like to think we have "spy" bases in South Korea, Japan, Taiwan.Is China's latest provocation a new spy base in Cuba? Here's why that would concern US
China's latest provocations is a spy base in Cuba. Here's why that concerns experts.
New disclosure of a Chinese spy base in Cuba underscores deep US concern over Beijing's global military expansion efforts.www.usatoday.com
Precursor to another event like October 1962?
Or is it America's own fault for trying to isolate Cuba over the last 60 years?
The fact that we took up business with communist China like the phony bastards our "elite" are, while continuing to merely isolate Cuba and failing to overthrow the commies there, says we deserve this.Is China's latest provocation a new spy base in Cuba? Here's why that would concern US
China's latest provocations is a spy base in Cuba. Here's why that concerns experts.
New disclosure of a Chinese spy base in Cuba underscores deep US concern over Beijing's global military expansion efforts.www.usatoday.com
Precursor to another event like October 1962?
Or is it America's own fault for trying to isolate Cuba over the last 60 years?
Probably would have taken a Harvard neo-Marxist getting a soft denunciation of communism out of them given the timing, and that wasn't going to come from a committed soft communist like ObummerNo a spy "base" vs nukes is not the same. The USSR used Cuba as a "listening" post for decades. I would like to think we have "spy" bases in South Korea, Japan, Taiwan.
I would have thought after the death of Fidel the USA and Cuba would have closer relations.
No they aren't.China is an economic and military power that rivals our own status. This creates a unique challenge for us because any type of conflict creates a no win situation.
Is China's latest provocation a new spy base in Cuba? Here's why that would concern US
China's latest provocations is a spy base in Cuba. Here's why that concerns experts.
New disclosure of a Chinese spy base in Cuba underscores deep US concern over Beijing's global military expansion efforts.www.usatoday.com
Precursor to another event like October 1962?
Or is it America's own fault for trying to isolate Cuba over the last 60 years?
Failure?Sixty years of failure with no end in sight.
Failure?
What was the goal that was failed?
Cuba has been isolated and crushed economically. Their Communist Regime has been a non factor in the world since the beginning. Aside from overthrowing the Regime it has been an astounding success.
There are numerous ways to deal with this. The best and quietest is probably electronically to block their intelligence gathering attempts.Is China's latest provocation a new spy base in Cuba? Here's why that would concern US
China's latest provocations is a spy base in Cuba. Here's why that concerns experts.
New disclosure of a Chinese spy base in Cuba underscores deep US concern over Beijing's global military expansion efforts.www.usatoday.com
Precursor to another event like October 1962?
Or is it America's own fault for trying to isolate Cuba over the last 60 years?
I would agree that sanctions don't work as a regime change tool. They do however work in making that regime starved for cash which limits their external (as well as internal) capabilities.The stated purpose of the embargo was to end the Castro regime and install democracy. By any standard that has been a complete total and spectacular failure.
It’s a failure that’s left the Cuban people in utter poverty. While triggering mass migrations that have significantly burdened neighboring countries.
Oh and it’s helped shore up and entrench the CCP over the years. Always giving the regime something to blame its failures on.
Long term sanctions don’t work.
I would agree that sanctions don't work as a regime change tool. They do however work in making that regime starved for cash which limits their external (as well as internal) capabilities.
Sanctions also make regime change more difficult IMO because they limit the resources of the population to overthrow the regime. So that leaves only a couple of options. Neither is really a good one.
The question is are we (the West) better off with an economically isolated communist country that can't really threaten other Democracies or is it better to remove that regime militarily?
Cuba's Communist regime isn't a bother to anyone except Cuban citizens. In that regard our policies of the last 60 years have been successful.
The flip side is they prosper like China and then become a minor regional threat.They likely wouldn’t exist for long if we lifted the sanctions. No more excuses time to deliver for the people or else. We could also carrot them to doing what we prefer.
I view sanctions of this duration as a moral and ethical failure. We’ve left generations in utter poverty and that doesn’t sit well with me.
No they aren't.
China isn't anywhere close to a near peer in either a
True that, but Cuba's communist leaders have been used as pawnsFailure?
What was the goal that was failed?
Cuba has been isolated and crushed economically. Their Communist Regime has been a non factor in the world since the beginning. Aside from overthrowing the Regime it has been an astounding success.
True that. The Communist regime in Cuba in itself represents no threat to the US, yet its presence offers to our adversaries a potential springboard to the American homeland. Opportunity cost if you will.Failure?
What was the goal that was failed?
Cuba has been isolated and crushed economically. Their Communist Regime has been a non factor in the world since the beginning. Aside from overthrowing the Regime it has been an astounding success.
There's only one way to get rid of a communist regime.True that, but Cuba's communist leaders have been used as pawns
True that. The Communist regime in Cuba in itself represents no threat to the US, yet its presence offers to our adversaries a potential springboard to the American homeland. Opportunity cost if you will.
How do you figure that?They likely wouldn’t exist for long if we lifted the sanctions.
What if those people don't want a change? We've tried that in the ME. It didn't work so well. Some people prefer totalitarianism in their leadership.No more excuses time to deliver for the people or else. We could also carrot them to doing what we prefer.
We are under no obligation to share our wealth with every country and peoples. The sanctions are a carrot and a stick. Cuba and others have decided the stick is better than the carrot.I view sanctions of this duration as a moral and ethical failure. We’ve left generations in utter poverty and that doesn’t sit well with me.
How do you figure that?
There are no historical examples of Communist Regimes being removed and the country Democratized by encouraging trade with them. In fact there is an example of encouraging trade strengthening a Communist Regime.
What if those people don't want a change? We've tried that in the ME. It didn't work so well. Some people prefer totalitarianism in their leadership.
We are under no obligation to share our wealth with every country and peoples. The sanctions are a carrot and a stick. Cuba and others have decided the stick is better than the carrot.
The flip side is they prosper like China and then become a minor regional threat.
Probably the smartest post on this topic. I would add stop them from stealing anything we produce in general. They have close to 350,000 people on student visa's alone in our country most of military age imbedded in our colleges, live right on top of our military bases and military institutions, access to any libraries that may show any type of blueprints they can steal and who knows who they have paid off in the financial institutions government officials and now working with Brazil and the Mexican drug cartels on and on and nobody seems to care. I won't even mention how much land they are gathering up along with Bill Gates.There are numerous ways to deal with this. The best and quietest is probably electronically to block their intelligence gathering attempts.
I remember when the same was true of the Chi-Comms, until the original neocon GHWBush moved to China with Babs and his bicycle and started cultivating the slave labor pool.Failure?
What was the goal that was failed?
Cuba has been isolated and crushed economically. Their Communist Regime has been a non factor in the world since the beginning. Aside from overthrowing the Regime it has been an astounding success.
Obama made love to Raul Castro in the media when Fidel croaked, to prevent that.The stated purpose of the embargo was to end the Castro regime and install democracy. By any standard that has been a complete total and spectacular failure.
Nothing like beautiful weather to make poverty tolerable.It’s a failure that’s left the Cuban people in utter poverty. While triggering mass migrations that have significantly burdened neighboring countries.
Oh and it’s helped shore up and entrench the CCP over the years. Always giving the regime something to blame its failures on.
I can’t see how anyone that isn’t a sanctions hawk could look at Cuba and think “ success”.
Cultivate the underdog notion, and build some rah-rah for battle. I despise these chicken-hawk people.The Pentagon Is Freaking Out About a Potential War With China
(Because America might lose.)www.politico.com
Interesting piece here
If China launches a pre-emptive strike on US bases it will end very badly for China.The Pentagon Is Freaking Out About a Potential War With China
(Because America might lose.)www.politico.com
Interesting piece here
If China pulls a sneak attack on US bases it won't require a rah-rah for retaliation. It more likely will need to tamp down calls for nuking Bejing and dozens of other cities.Cultivate the underdog notion, and build some rah-rah for battle. I despise these chicken-hawk people.
They won't. Unless they go all in and nuke us, here at home.If China pulls a sneak attack on US bases it won't require a rah-rah for retaliation. It more likely will need to tamp down calls for nuking Bejing and dozens of other cities.
Won't happen, for that reason.If China launches a pre-emptive strike on US bases it will end very badly for China.
There's a pretty significant precedence for that.